U.S. President Donald Trump accused China of orchestrating “the largest compromise of election data in history” during a primetime address on Thursday, alleging foreign interference in the 2020 presidential election. China’s Foreign Ministry denied the claims, calling them baseless and reaffirming its policy of non-interference in other nations’ affairs.

Trump’s Allegations and China’s Response

In his speech from the White House East Room, Trump asserted that China acquired 220 million sensitive U.S. voter files—data that is commercially available—and suggested Beijing may have attempted to “manufacture illegal ballots.” He also revived a conspiracy theory involving Venezuela and accused U.S. officials of withholding intelligence from his daily briefings.

China’s Foreign Ministry countered that the allegations lacked factual basis, emphasizing the country’s adherence to non-intervention. Former U.S. national security officials and Democrats, including California Gov. Gavin Newsom, dismissed the speech as filled with falsehoods, with Newsom labeling it “the ramblings of a mad king.”

Reactions and Criticism

Critics, including MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell, condemned the address as “a demented 25-minute exhibition of political pornography,” comparing it to a “proof of dementia video.” O’Donnell also highlighted Trump’s past efforts to pressure Georgia officials into altering vote counts, arguing that no one has done more to undermine U.S. elections than Trump himself.

CNN analyst John King described the speech as “ominous” and likened its claims to a spy novel, noting that Trump never directly linked foreign interference to altered election results. King added that Trump’s rhetoric has made bipartisan discussions on election security increasingly difficult.

What Happens Next

Trump’s address comes 109 days before the midterm elections, with the president urging Congress to pass partisan voting restriction legislation. Meanwhile, election officials warn that his remarks could deepen public distrust in the electoral process. The White House has not provided evidence supporting the new allegations, and much of the declassified material appears to reiterate previously known information.